KITCOU - Utrecht Qualifier

#1 - good testimony п.6.5.2 (Вписался в неправильную версию (если явно сказал, что он в версии с чёрным, может уйти за него, что у шерифа с ним собрана команда и не передумал до конца голосования; в том числе если после того, как его заголосовали, жёстко вписался в версию черного)) #3 - attacked 7 and 10, but was changing his mind during the rounds #4 - attacked 7 and 10 consistently, gave a good testimony for the victory #8 - found 2 red, didn't want to vote him out

#4 - won the version well #1,6 - were strengthening the version of #4 very well #9 - wrong version for protocol

#2 - won the version well #1 - was playing against his Don to make it impossible to team them up #4 - was talking in a way that other players could not team him up with 1 #8 - wrong version for protocol #6 - was attacking 2 from 0 round

#4 - killed sheriff, gave up #5 - was impossible to team him up with 4, which resulted in the decision for 3×3 #6 - was suspected by some players, but still wasn't voted out #1 - 6.7.15 #7 - was voting against 4 without balance at the round of 9, wanted to vote out #4 instead of #3 later on

#6 - survived until the end despite the bad speech at the round of 9 #7 - was the least suspicious among all mafias, won the battle against 1 #1 - understood that 7 is black and tried to gather votes for him, but didn't convince the city #3 - good counterweight

#3 - suggested a split for the victory several rounds, wanted to stand up with 5 and 6 #6 - won a super hard game without any help from the team #4 - mission in dynamics #9 - good testimony #8 - played against 3 black players

#1 - gathered votes against 3 #4 - voted his Don out, misshot #10 - gave good arguments against 7

#7 - won the version #3 - survived #8 - good check 3 #1 - pretended playing in the version of the sheriff, then broke the split #9 - voted against black player, but couldn't convince others