KITCOU Final 2025

#1 - decided to vote out 8 before 7 #2 - left a testimony that 9, 10 are red. Also said that 8 is more black than 7. But nothing confident or for protocol. #3 - convinced #1 to vote out #7. #1 still wasn't confident at the guess round, because of #3 emotions. #4 - 5 is black for protocol #6 - covered the sheriff and saved #9. Left a good testimony without the protocol. #10 - played against 3 from the early rounds

#2 - won the guess round against 2 testimonies, cool move with killing #5 #5,10 - good testmonies #10 - played against all black players consistently

#1 - revealed himself, voted the sheriff out, gave up #2 - gave a testimony that 3 should be voted out, suspected 3 from the round of 9 #3 - convinced the city to vote out 10, misshot Also, split up with #8 despite being black for the city. #4 - was very red for the city, misshot #8 - voted the sheriff out #9 - votes the sheriff out #10 - left 3 as his counterweight in addition to #1 who was the balance

#2 - broke the split at 0 round #3 - was very red for the table, gathered votes against the red player at the critical round #5 - counterweight 8 #8 - good arguments in the version #9 - won the version, cool move with the self-shot #10,7,2 - didn't vote against the correct counterweight

#4 - was almost not suspicious #7 - survived the attack #8 - gave a testimony that #7 should be voted out before #10. Also, figured out that #4 is suspicious #10 - voted out the red check, killed sheriff

#1 - won the version #2 - not confidently left 4 more sheriff #7 - wasn't under attack #9 - voted himself out, but left 1 as a counterweight #10 - nominated and voted out #9, survived the round of 7 #5,3 - didn't play the correct counterweight of #9

#1 - was very red for the city #3 - #2 black for protocol, good testimony in general #4 - was super red for the city and led the city to 2×2

#1 - was red for a long time by voting at 7, gave good arguments, won the guess round #2 - figured out the team 1 and 3 in the game de-facto without the sheriff #4 - voted out #7 without the balance, suspected 3 #6 - not so confidently, but at some point figured out the team 1 and 3 #9 - voted out #7 without the balance

#1 - said that waits #9 outside in 10 minutes despite the single version of #9 at that moment #3 - 2 black checks, took 3 fouls and survived the round of 9 #8 - saw the communication between 4 and 9, was the first one to attack 4 #10 - decided the round of 5 correctly

#1,4 - voted out #5 with no reason #4 - misshot #7 - gathered votes against #5 at the round of 9. Convinced all black players to vote him out ;) Also, gave a good testimony that #1 decides with whom to split

#1 - found the sheriff, killed him #2,4 - survived the attack, made it 2*2 #7 - compensatory points for #4 black for protocol #8,10 - voting against the protocol

#1 - covered the sheriff without understanding who the sheriff was, teamed up with the sheriff confidently #2 - confidently played in the correct version the whole game, the protocol version was left when 8 was the sheriff almost surely #4 - left the correct version for protocol #8 - 3 black checks, played with 246 and probably 1 at the zero round. Never considered black players as red. #10 - played incorrectly, but still left #5 as his counterweight